Prior to the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak, the credit market was riding a prolonged 11-year bull cycle. The loan market, in particular, had seen a pervasiveness of borrower friendly late cycle excesses that resulted in capital structures predicated on increasingly optimistic assumptions of future performance. The onset of COVID-19 may have provided a catalyst for a recession – abruptly shutting down economic activity, forcing self-isolation, and creating a very uncertain future outlook.
While the Federal Reserve put in place several trillion dollars of stimulus packages, it appears a number of the policies will not provide meaningful relief to many private equity-backed middle-market borrowers. In the coming months, these companies will need to address liquidity concerns and capital structures.
Rescue finance (“Rescue Finance”) is a pocket of lending between performing credit and pureplay distressed credit. Rescue Finance, particularly in private equity-backed deals, involves consensual cooperation between the lender and company owner. Unlike other distressed debt strategies that generally involve an adversarial workout or bankruptcy, the solution helps the equity owner retain control and buy time to restore equity value.
While a significant amount of capital has been raised in recent years for broader distressed investing strategies, Rescue Finance remains a relatively uncrowded niche – especially in the middle market, where reputation, sourcing capabilities, and access to information are critical for success.
COVID-19 and its exponential rate of transmission has caused national, state, and local governments to take extreme actions to limit the spread of the disease and “flatten the curve.” One of those extreme measures is to encourage or require people to self-isolate and “shelter in place,” which has resulted in the temporary shutdown of non-essential businesses and industries across the country.
This has caused rapid, meaningful declines in economic activity and instability in the financial markets.
Monetary and fiscal response has taken on a “whatever it takes” posture, enacting multi-trillion-dollar stimulus packages to help companies through this transition period. While the policies are still being finalized, it appears many will not provide substantial liquidity to non-investment grade middle-market borrowers owned by private equity sponsors.
As a result, these companies have begun to actively look for ways to stabilize balance sheets and capital structures. As a first line of defense, many have started to utilize liquidity options currently available to them, such as fully drawing on revolving credit facilities or asking lenders and vendors for forgiveness on near-term payments.
However, short-term solutions may not be enough to address their ultimate liquidity needs.
Many companies are preparing for the worst-case scenario of a prolonged shutdown and slow economic recovery and have started to explore their financing options. Under the current environment, many borrowers are finding themselves with unsustainable capital structures.
While a significant amount of capital has been raised in recent years for broader distressed investing strategies, Rescue Finance remains a relatively uncrowded niche in the middle market
While a significant amount of capital has been raised in recent years for broader distressed investing strategies, Rescue Finance remains a relatively uncrowded niche in the middle market, as a successful strategy for borrowers requires several key attributes:
In addition, several key middle-market stakeholder dynamics in this environment result in the need for Rescue Finance transactions:
The below example is an illustrative transaction which has a 10.0x purchase price, initially capitalized with 6.0x leverage (all senior), and a 4.0x equity cushion.
As a result of decreased financial performance and its initial leverage, this company may find itself in need of additional liquidity, and / or an existing lender is unwilling to provide additional capital due to outstanding covenants as well as other defaults and overall leverage.
Contrary to the broader liquid leveraged loan market, where many deals are covenant lite, deals in the private market generally contain maintenance-based financial covenants.² Companies in covenant default will be compelled to address their balance sheet needs.
At that stage the sponsor will be faced with three options:
In this illustrative example, the Rescue Finance lender provides junior capital to pay down existing debt to a more normalized leverage level of 4.0x EBITDA.
Post market recovery, the business refinances, taking out the more expensive rescue capital, resulting in a lower cost permanent capital structure and a recovery for the sponsor.
Contrary to prior market downturns, many of the challenges that today’s businesses are facing have been forced upon them as a result of a COVID-19 related shutdown. The impact of the shutdown will undoubtedly linger on the economy for some time and the prospect of what a recovery looks like to many businesses remains uncertain. With a trusted lending partner, Rescue Finance can be an attractive option for equity owners and companies to bridge through the end of this cycle.
1. Source: LCD LBO Purchase Multiples
2. Source: Refinitiv
Important Considerations: This information (the “Paper”) is provided for educational purposes only and is not investment advice or an offer or sale of any security or investment product or investment advice. Offerings are made only pursuant to a private offering memorandum containing important information. Statements in this Paper are made as of the date of this Paper unless stated otherwise, and there is no implication that the information contained herein is correct as of any time subsequent to such date. All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable and current, but accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Projections or forward-looking statements contained in the Paper are only estimates of future results or events that are based upon assumptions made at the time such projections or statements were developed or made; actual results may be significantly different from the projections. Also, general economic factors, which are not predictable, can have a material impact on the reliability of projections or forward-looking statements.